162 Results for “William Lazonick”
-
Article
How the U.S. New Economy Business Model has devalued science & engineering PhDs
May 9, 2017
This note comments on Eric Weinstein’s, “How and Why Government, Universities, and Industries Create Domestic Labor Shortages of Scientists and High-Tech Workers,” posted recently on INET’s website.
-
Working Paper
Working PaperThe Unmaking of the Black Blue-Collar Middle Class
May 2021
How once-promising Black upward mobility reversed course, and what can be done about it
-
News
Washington Post Features Bill Lazonick's Research
Aug 16, 2018
The Washington Post cites William Lazonick’s INET paper on shareholder value
-
News
William Lazonick’s INET funded research is cited in the American Prospect.
Oct 26, 2021
“Nobody but those top corporate executives was really paying attention to share buybacks until the middle of the last decade, when University of Massachusetts economist William Lazonick wrote an article for the Harvard Business Review documenting the surprising and depressing fact that the companies that had belonged to the Fortune 500 during the previous decade had spent so much on share buybacks and dividends that the total was either equal to or actually exceeded their profits.”
-
News
INET working paper on how maximizing shareholder value led to minimizing national interests is cited in The American Prospect
Dec 7, 2020
“If companies continue to prioritize maximizing shareholder wealth at the expense of other key stakeholders, and at the expense of investing in innovation, then the Green New Deal could reinforce long-standing income and wealth inequities and the decline in innovation in the U.S. economy (for an important example, Bill Lazonick and Matt Hopkins document how maximizing shareholder value minimized the strategic national stockpile for ventilators and personal protective equipment).” —Lenore M Palladino
-
Working Paper
Conference paperThe Innovative Enterprise and the Developmental State: Toward an Economics of “Organizational Success”
Apr 2011
Investment in productive capabilities provides the foundation for economic growth.
-
Working Paper
Working Paper SeriesWho Invests in the High-Tech Knowledge Base?
May 2014
A nation must accumulate a high-tech knowledge base to prosper.
-
Working Paper
Working Paper SeriesWhy the CHIPS Are Down: Stock Buybacks and Subsidies in the U.S. Semiconductor Industry
Oct 2021
To strengthen the American semiconductor industry, Congress should condition additional funds on suspending stock buybacks
-
Article
How MBA Programs Drive Inequality
Jul 7, 2016
Business school students are taught to extract resources instead of creating value.
-
Article
Financialization of the U.S. Pharmaceutical Industry
Dec 2, 2019
Pharmaceutical drugs are often a matter of life or death. It should be a prime objective of government policy to rid the industry of financialization.
-
Article
They Looted Companies — Now They're Looting the Government
May 12, 2025
Economist William Lazonick reveals how the extraction model of American corporations has migrated from business to government.
-
Working Paper
Grantee paperThe Financialization of the US Corporation: What Has Been Lost, and How It Can Be Regained
Jun 2012
Background paper for a presentation to the Seattle University School of Law Berle IV Symposiun, “The Future of Financial/Securities Markets,” London June 14-15, 2012.
-
Working Paper
Working Paper SeriesEmployment Mobility and the Belated Emergence of the Black Middle Class
Jan 2021
“Build back” means restoring the government and business investments in the productive capabilities of the U.S. labor force that created a growing middle class in the three decades after World War II
-
Working Paper
Conference paperProfits Without Prosperity: How Stock Buybacks Manipulate the Market, and Leave Most Americans Worse Off
Apr 2014
Five years after the end of the Great Recession, corporate profits are high and the stock market is booming. Yet most Americans are not sharing in the apparent prosperity.
-
Article
Economists Warn: Trump’s Intel Move Looks Like Performance, Not Policy
Aug 26, 2025
Two economists who have studied Intel warn that Trump’s move to take a stake in the company amounts to flashy optics, incoherent strategy, and a creeping politicization of economic policy.